<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>

<rdf:RDF
 xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
 xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"
 xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/"
 xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
 xmlns:syn="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
 xmlns:prism="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/prism/"
 xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
>

<channel rdf:about="http://jsw.sagepub.com">
<title>Journal of Social Work RSS feed -- OnlineFirst Articles</title>
<link>http://jsw.sagepub.com</link>
<description>Journal of Social Work RSS feed -- OnlineFirst Articles</description>
<prism:publicationName>Journal of Social Work</prism:publicationName>
<prism:issn>1468-0173</prism:issn>
<items>
 <rdf:Seq>
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jsw.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/1468017309342520v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jsw.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/1468017309342191v1?rss=1" />
 </rdf:Seq>
</items>
<image rdf:resource="http://jsw.sagepub.com:80/icons/banner/title.gif" />
</channel>

<image rdf:about="http://jsw.sagepub.com:80/icons/banner/title.gif">
<title>Journal of Social Work</title>
<url>http://jsw.sagepub.com:80/icons/banner/title.gif</url>
<link>http://jsw.sagepub.com</link>
</image>

<item rdf:about="http://jsw.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/1468017309342520v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Social service organizations in the era of evidence-based practice: The learning organization as a guiding framework for bridging science to service]]></title>
<link>http://jsw.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/1468017309342520v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>&bull; <I>Summary</I>: Evidence-based practice (EBP) has been gaining acceptance and momentum in the social services professions.  As evidence related to specific programs and interventions mount, social service practitioners and organizations around the world have increasingly begun to implement evidence-based programs as a strategy for creating better outcomes for children, families, and adults. Unfortunately, the science of evaluating efficacious and effective programs and interventions has far outpaced the science of implementing them. A gap exists between what we know works and being able to utilize what works in practice. This article will examine the challenges facing social service organizations in implementing evidence-based programs and explore an organizational theory to address those challenges.
&bull; <I>Findings</I>: The implementation of EBPs has proven to be a complex and challenging process, with organizational factors coming to the forefront as important in bridging the gap between science and service. The complexity of translating what we know from research into practice requires an organizing theory to help guide implementation efforts in the context of an organization.
&bull; <I>Applications</I>: This article proposes the use of a theoretical framework, the <I>learning organization</I>, by social service organizations. By transforming social service organizations into learning organizations, social service organizations will be able to more effectively meet the challenges of implementing evidence-based programs and function as a bridge, rather than a barrier, between science and service.
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Maynard, B. R.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Tue, 04 Aug 2009 04:25:23 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/1468017309342520</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Social service organizations in the era of evidence-based practice: The learning organization as a guiding framework for bridging science to service]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-08-04</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jsw.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/1468017309342191v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Risk assessments for mental health service users: Ethical, valid and reliable? ]]></title>
<link>http://jsw.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/1468017309342191v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>&bull; <I>Summary</I>: This article considers the nature and basis of risk assessments in mental health services, based on empirical research on the tools used within NHS Mental Health Trusts in England which found a wide variety of such tools in use within them.
&bull; <I>Findings</I>: The article examines the problems and potential benefits in the use of such tools, and argues for an inclusive and holistic approach to risk assessments which incorporate our knowledge of the risks of risk assessments. The article pays particular attention to risk assessment procedures as relevant to social workers who have to uphold the requirements of the General Social Care Council Code of Practice, which provides particular emphasis on issues of risk, and service user and carer involvement in assessments. Potential biases and limitations of risk assessment approaches, it is proposed, need to be taken into account in order to have a balanced view of the value of such approaches.
&bull; <I>Applications</I>: The article provides a critique of the validity and effectiveness of current risk assessment tools, focusing in upon one key area in mental health work, the assessment and management of potential violence.
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Littlechild, B., Hawley, C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Tue, 04 Aug 2009 04:25:21 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/1468017309342191</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Risk assessments for mental health service users: Ethical, valid and reliable? ]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-08-04</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

</rdf:RDF>