This Article Abstract Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Noble, C. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Postmodern Thinking

Where is it Taking Social Work?

University of Western Sydney, Australia

•Summary: Postmodern discourse in contemporary social work literature has captured a growing audience and is raising a serious challenge for social work theory and practice. While attention is being focused on this new post-activist work the role and function of the welfare state in many western democratic countries is being devalued. At the same time state-based services and resources are being cut, with social workers becoming prime targets for rationalization. Addressing and responding to this postmodern ‘turn’is one of the major challenges that confront social work today: a concern that needs urgent attention if social work is to remain a viable player in the ‘post welfare’debate.

•Findings: Social work needs to wake up from the enticing, almost mesmerizing effect of postmodern discourse and take another look at the way economic, gender and colonial issues continue to lie at the root of injustice and impoverishment. Focusing on the local and the contextuality of the specific takes attention away from the pervasive power of structural forces. Rather than call for the negation of grand theories, social work needs to realign itself with a more, rather than less, national and global focus.

•Applications: Postmodern social work argues for the jettisoning of ‘grand’or ‘universal’social change theories on which social work was founded, in favour of the re-appreciation of the local and the everyday contexts of practice as sites for action and resistance. Underlying this development is a neo-conservative ideology that creates great discrepancies between rich and poor and undermines traditional social work theory and practice. Ultimately social work must refocus its attention on exposing global economic inequalities and oppressive gender and ethnicity-based relations across the globe. Social work will survive in its mission if it takes on this challenge in addition to the micro-deconstruction offered by the postmodern discourse. Finding a way forward means combining the personal with the political so that both are integrated into a more relevant social work discourse.

Key Words: postmodernity • post welfare debate • social work • social work education

References

• Bailey, R.and Brake, M.(eds) (1975) Radical Social Work. London: Edward Arnold .
• Bauman, Z.(1992) Intimations of Postmodernity. London: Routledge .
• Bauman, Z.(2002) ‘A Sociological Theory of Postmodernity’, in C. Calhoun, J. Gerteis, J. Moody, S. Pfaffand I. Virk(eds) Contemporary Sociological Theory. Oxford: Blackwell .
• Dominelli, L.(2002) Anti-Oppressive Social Work Theory and Practice. Hampshire: Palgrave .
• Fellin, P.(2000) ‘Revisiting Multiculturalism in Social Work’ , Journal of Social Work Education 36(2): 261–278 .
• Foucault, M.(1982) ‘The Subject and Power’ , Critical Inquiry 8(Summer): 777–795 .[CrossRef]
• Healy, K.(2000) Social Work Practices: Contemporary Perspectives on Change. London: Sage .
• Healy, K. and Leonard, P.(2000) ‘Responding to Uncertainty: Critical Social Work Education in the Postmodern Habitat’ , Journal of Progressive Human Services 11(1): 23–48 .
• Hugman, R.(1998) Social Welfare and Social Value. London: Macmillan .
• Hugman, R.(2001) ‘Post-Welfare Social Work? Reconsidering Post-Modernism, Post-Fordism and Social Work Education’ , Social Work Education 20(3): 321–333 .[CrossRef]
• Ife, J.(1997) Rethinking Social Work: Towards Critical Practice. South Melbourne: Longman .
• Ife, J.(1999) ‘Postmodernism, Critical Theory and Social Work’, in B. Peaseand J. Fook(eds) Transforming Social Work Practice: Postmodern Critical Perspectives. Sydney: Allen and Unwin .
• Irving, A.(1994) ‘From Image to Simulacra: The Modern/Postmodern Divide and Social Work’, in A. Chambonand A. Irving(eds) Essays on Postmodernism and Social Work. Toronto: Canadian Scholars’Press .
• Irving, A.(1999) ‘Waiting for Foucault: Social Work and the Multitudinous Truth(s) of Life’, in A. Chambon, A. Irvingand L. Epstein(eds) Reading Foucault for Social Work. New York: Columbia University Press .
• Jameson, F.(1984) ‘Postmodernism or the Cultural Logic of Late Capitalism’ , New Left Review 146: 53–92 .
• Jamrozik, A.(2001) Social Policy in the Post-Welfare State: Australia on the Threshold of the 21st Century. South Melbourne: Longman .
• Kellner, D.(1989) Critical Theory, Modernity and Marxism. Cambridge: Polity Press .
• Leonard, P.(1997) Postmodern Welfare: Reconstructing an Emancipatory Project. London: Sage .
• Luhmann, N.(2002) ‘Describing the Future’, in C. Calhoun, J. Gerteis, J. Moody, S. Pfaffand I. Virk(eds) Contemporary Sociological Theory. Oxford: Blackwell .
• Lyotard, J-F.(1991) The Postmodern Condition: A Report on Knowledge. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press .
• McLaren, P.(1995) Critical Pedagogy and Predatory Culture: Oppositional Politics in a Postmodern Era. London: Routledge .
• Midgley, J.(1999) ‘Postmodernism and Social Development: Implications for Progress, Intervention and Ideology’ , Social Development Issues 21(3): 5–13 .
• Mishra, R.(1999) Globalisation and the Welfare State. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar .
• Noble, C.(2003) ‘Discursive Scholarship in Anti-Racist/Cross-Cultural Social Work Education’ , Advances in Social Work and Welfare Education 5(1): 98–108 .
• Parton, N. and O’Byrne, P.(2000) Constructive Social Work: Towards a New Practice. Hampshire: Palgrave .
• Pease, B.and Fook, J.(eds) (1999) Transforming Social Work Practice: Postmodern Critical Perspectives. Sydney: Allen and Unwin .
• Powell, F.(2001) The Politics of Social Work. London: Sage .
• Razack, N.(2002) Transforming the Field: Critical Antiracist and Anti-Oppressive Perspectives for the Human Services Practicum. Halifax: Fernwood .
• Seidman, S.(1994) Contested Knowledge: Social Theory in the Postmodern Era. Oxford: Blackwell .
• Seligman, A.(1998) The Problem of Trust. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press .
• Stokes, P and Knight, B(1997) ‘ACitizen’s Charter to Save our Cities’, Independent, 1 Jan.

Journal of Social Work, Vol. 4, No. 3, 289-304 (2004)
DOI: 10.1177/1468017304047747


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				P. Stepney Mission Impossible? Critical Practice in Social Work Br. J. Soc. Work, December 1, 2006; 36(8): 1289 - 1307. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This Article Abstract Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Noble, C. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?