Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Social Work
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by White, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Fabled Uncertainty in Social Work

A Coda to Spafford et al

Sue White

University of Lancaster, England, s.j.white{at}lancaster.ac.uk

Summary: In a recent issue of this journal, Marlee Spafford and her colleagues reported on a Canadian study of social work, medical and optometry students. One of their findings was that the novice social workers viewed the acknowledgement of uncertainty as a hallmark of professional competence. Drawing on data from UK-based studies of professional reasoning, this article challenges the notion that social work has embraced and engaged with uncertainty.

Findings: Despite the obvious ambiguities of many cases, much of the time social workers often feel very sure of their formulations. This is because social work takes place in the terrain of human relationships about which we all, qua human beings, routinely make moral evaluations in everyday life. Rhetoric of complexity and reflection should not be confused with uncertainty.

Applications : This article endorses Spafford et al.'s respect for uncertainty and tentativeness, but argues that it is folly to think that we already have it in social work. A tentative and sceptical vocabulary of the emotional and moral domain is required if social work is indeed to embrace and acknowledge the limits and fallibilities of its technologies and practices.

Key Words: case formulation • culture • emotion • moral judgement • professional identities • uncertainty

Journal of Social Work, Vol. 9, No. 2, 222-235 (2009)
DOI: 10.1177/1468017308101824


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of Social WorkHome page
K. Juhila, C. Hall, and S. Raitakari
Accounting for the Clients' Troublesome Behaviour in a Supported Housing Unit: Blames, Excuses and Responsibility in Professionals' Talk
Journal of Social Work, January 1, 2010; 10(1): 59 - 79.
[Abstract] [PDF]