Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information on Social Problems, 2e

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Social Work
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Clare, B.
Right arrow Articles by Mevik, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

`Inclusive Education'

Teaching Social Work Students to Work with Children

Brenda Clare

University of Western Australia, Australia, bclare{at}cyllene.uwa.edu.au

Kate Mevik

Bodø University College, Norway, kate.mevik{at}hibo.no

Summary: The article presents the findings of an exploratory study that considers the extent to which Australian and Norwegian social work education equips practitioners to work inclusively with children. It provides an analysis of details of curricula content found on universities' websites to provide a broad-brush map of teaching and learning priorities. It then presents the views of a number of Norwegian and Australian academics about what social work students are, and should be, taught about childhood and working with children.

Findings: The article reports a number of differences in emphasis in the teaching and learning models adopted in Australian and Norwegian social work programmes. Despite these differences, however, the tentative conclusion drawn from this study is that in both countries, equipping students to understand and work with children in their own right is a low priority. Reasons for this common outcome are discussed.

Applications : The scale of the study is small. However, the findings are of significance for social work educators, practitioners and policy-makers. If children are to be properly represented within the welfare arena, foundational professional education must equip students with knowledge, skills and attitudes that enable them to work with and for this population. The article argues that this may not be the case and highlights the need for further research.

Key Words: children • inclusion • professional education • social work students

Journal of Social Work, Vol. 8, No. 1, 28-44 (2008)
DOI: 10.1177/1468017307084734


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?