Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Social Work
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Carey, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

White-Collar Proletariat?

Braverman, the Deskilling/Upskilling of Social Work and the Paradoxical Life of the Agency Care Manager

Malcolm Carey

Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool, England,m.carey{at}ljmu.ac.uk

Summary: This paper considers the experience of a small cohort of agency care managers 1 (N = 23) in the context of the ongoing debate about the deskilling of social work. Evidence is presented and discussed in relation to post-war studies of the labour process and asks whether Braverman's proposition that deskilling is an inevitable outcome of capitalism's labour process has any relevance in explaining whether agency social workers are `white-collar proletarians' or not.

Findings: The article identifies that there have been important changes to the social work labour process, including the regimes of care/case management and the subsequent intensification of employee workloads and deskilling (particularly for agency workers). However, for agency workers there are important processes that have stood to contain the full impact of proletarianization.

Applications : The evidence provided suggests that 1) social work is still experiencing significant forces of change which continue to extend the process of proletarianization; 2) the expansion of the private sector in social care and the continuing reliance upon agency care managers remain but two examples of such detrimental change for both social work and service users/carers; and 3) without resistance deskilling and marginalization are likely to continue.

Key Words: agency • care management • crisis • flexibility • proletarianization • social work • work intensification

Journal of Social Work, Vol. 7, No. 1, 93-114 (2007)
DOI: 10.1177/1468017307075992


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Br J Soc WorkHome page
M. Carey
The Order of Chaos: Exploring Agency Care Managers' Construction of Social Order within Fragmented Worlds of State Social Work
Br. J. Soc. Work, April 1, 2009; 39(3): 556 - 573.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br J Soc WorkHome page
L. Curtis, J. Moriarty, and A. Netten
The Expected Working Life of a Social Worker
Br. J. Soc. Work, April 1, 2009; (2009) bcp039v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]