This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Lancaster, E. Articles by Lumb, J. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

The Assessment of Risk in the National Probation Service of England and Wales

Formerly of University of Bradford, UK

Jeannie Lumb

University of Bradford, UK

Summary: This article focuses on the National Probation Service of England and Wales and explores the dominance of a particular approach to risk assessment. Reference is made to other areas of social work practice.

Findings: The article starts with a description of probation practice in relation to the assessment of risk using the current risk/needs assessment tool, the Offender Assessment System (OASys). The article explores the distinction between risk of reconviction and risk of harm and the use of static and dynamic factors in assessment. It then moves to a consideration of issues arising in two areas. The first of these is the relationship between risk and concepts of proportionality and fairness within the justice system. The second area for consideration is some implications of the dominance of a particular form of risk assessment in the National Probation Service specifically in respect of the knowledge base of assessment; motivation; and the distinction between defensible and defensive judgements about risk made by individual practitioners.

Applications: A preoccupation with the technicalities of risk assessment has encouraged the overshadowing of proportionality and the erosion of the rights of ‘risky’ offenders. A rights-based, rather than a risk-based, emphasis in criminal justice innovations might redress the balance. An approach which explores protective factors, rather than risk factors, is worthy of consideration.

Key Words: assessment • motivation • probation • proportionality • risk

Journal of Social Work, Vol. 6, No. 3, 275-291 (2006)
DOI: 10.1177/1468017306071176


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?