Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Social Work
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fargion, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Thinking Professional Social Work

Expertise and Professional Ideologies in Social Workers’ Accounts of Their Practice

Silvia Fargion

University of Trento, Italy

Summary: Two different frameworks are identified with respect to social work practice and views of professional powers.

Findings: Accounts of social work practice, gathered in Italy, illustrate two styles of narrating and constructing the work experience. These are analysed following Mannheim’s seminal work on romantic and enlightenment styles of thought. Practitioners’ accounts differ in how sequences are constructed, in the meaning attributed to crucial aspects such as the understanding of the situation, and in the place attributed to theory. Two conceptions emerge of the relationship of professional social workers with clients, and of their power.

Applications: The article contributes to the debate on the relation between theory and practice in social work. Theoretical models are not viewed as potential sources of practical suggestions, but as whole perspectives with which to engage. They are ways of seeing and doing ‘things’ which stimulate critical reflection on one’s own work. The two ways of conceiving professional powers that emerge from this study appear embedded in different cognitive orders. This invites those seeking to identify new ways of conceiving professional powers to look at the whole social work culture, without trying to isolate single aspects or elements of it.

Key Words: professional cultures • social work knowledge • social work power • theory and practice

Journal of Social Work, Vol. 6, No. 3, 255-273 (2006)
DOI: 10.1177/1468017306071175


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
International Social WorkHome page
S. Fargion
Reflections on social work's identity: International themes in Italian practitioners' representation of social work
International Social Work, March 1, 2008; 51(2): 206 - 219.
[Abstract] [PDF]