Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information on Social Problems, 2e

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Social Work
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Magill, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

The Future of Evidence in Evidence-based Practice

Who Will Answer the Call for Clinical Relevance?

Molly Magill

Boston College Graduate School of Social Work, USA

Summary: This article considers factors important to the broad-scale adoption of an evidence-based approach to social work practice (EBP). Elements of the EBP framework, and particularly directions for future research, are examined in terms of a number of criticisms voiced in the literature.

Findings: Scholars in social work and allied disciplines have emphasized the implications of evidential hierarchies, and particularly the questionable clinical relevance of randomized controlled trials. While offering important considerations, arguments in opposition of EBP can be misconceived. Evidence-based practice is not merely a ‘best practice’ orientation, but a heuristic framework intended to foster explicit and accountable decisional capacities. Where EBP is limited highlights empirical questions that remain unanswered. Future directions for the approach will require the participation of both practitioners and researchers.

Applications: The article delineates the role of operationalized clinical decision-making, local clinical research, and the unique utilities of evaluation methodologies in building knowledge for a more clinically relevant evidence-base for social work practice.

Key Words: clinical social work practice • empirically supported treatment • epistemology • evaluation research • evidence-based practice knowledge use

Journal of Social Work, Vol. 6, No. 2, 101-115 (2006)
DOI: 10.1177/1468017306066737


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
International Social WorkHome page
P. McNamara and E. Neve
Engaging Italian and Australian social workers in evaluation
International Social Work, January 1, 2009; 52(1): 22 - 35.
[Abstract] [PDF]