Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Social Work
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mcconkey, R.
Right arrow Articles by Conliffe, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

The Features of Short-Break Residential Services Valued by Families Who Have Children with Multiple Disabilities

Roy Mcconkey

Maria Truesdale

Chris Conliffe

University of Ulster and Institute of Counselling and Personal Development, Northern Ireland

Summary: Children with physical and intellectual disabilities can place extra demands on their family carers. The need for short-break (respite) services is well documented but little research has been undertaken into the features of these services that families value. A mix of qualitative and quantitative methods was used. In the first phase, 108 parents in urban and rural areas described the features they liked about the short-break services they had received and the perceived benefits to them and their child. Their replies were validated at a consultation seminar with over 30 carers and professional workers. Apool of 47 items was then devised and in phase two, a sample of 59 families used them to rate one of three short-break services they had used.

Findings: Twelve distinguishing items were found across the three services. They were grouped into three distinct factors: characteristics of the services (eight items), benefits to the child (two items) and benefits to the carer (two items). Variations were found in carers’ expectations that need further exploration.

Applications: These findings should facilitate the development of quality standards for short-break residential services and help in the commissioning of services that accord with user aspirations.

Key Words: developmental disabilities • families • respite • short breaks

Journal of Social Work, Vol. 4, No. 1, 61-75 (2004)
DOI: 10.1177/1468017304042421


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?